in the past few weeks, i've had two people find me on facebook: these people don't know me, but they both submitted stories to the fancypants literary magazine where I used to work as an editorial intern. at the time I had written them detailed and personal rejection letters, for which they wanted to thank me.
one is a writer with an MFA and a job at a literary mag; her very good story made it to the final "readers roundtable" round of reading, and had all the magazine's readers arguing for or against it. although it didn't make the ultimate cut, it was a good story and i wanted to make sure she knew that. i remember taking particular care in the personal rejection letter i sent her, thinking "this woman could be me; in fact, she is a bit ahead of me in the game, and deserves props for that."
the other is a deployed naval soldier, an amateur writer who probably didn't have much experience. although his story engaged with a lot of really interesting ideas -- about the military and the current f'ed up state of US foreign engagements - it wasn't a fit for the mag. but i ended up having a dialogue with this writer, because he was unable to receive mail on his ship in the middle of the ocean, he had emailed us asking if he could submit a piece over email. Though it's stringently against such things as online submissions, the magazine made an exception for this deployed serviceman and i was able to consider his submission mcuh faster than the normal 9-month turnaround time for submissions. i didn't relate to this guy at all, but i was amazed by his tenacity -- sending short story submissions to magazine from a freakin' aircraft carrier-- and his work made me wish there were more outlets for soldiers to tell their stories in writing. (which i still wonder about -- are there any soldier-specific lit mags? we used to get a TON of submission from soldiers which weren't quite pro enough for lit mags but still deserve to be heard and printed...)
anyway, both of these very different writers have since contacted me (ah, the magic of facebook) and written me nice letters thanking me for my nice letters, even though i'm no longer at the magazine in question and it's been about a year since I was.
the point?
i dunno. it just really made my day to hear from both these writers. i had left my internship feeling somewhat disillusioned with the whole "literary magazine" enterpise, and specifically unhappy about the proliferation of unpaid internships in that industry which allows these magazines to function, but also taps the talent and commitment and resources of young writers and editors who, in fact,
should be paid for our labor but end up doing it for the resume credit anyway. i didn't leave on bad terms at all, but i ended up very grumpy about the whole enterprise in general. and hearing from these writers helped me, almost a year later, feel like my work there actually mattered. at least to two people. which is a lot. it also made me remember how it's important to be real, and polite, and respectful to people (something this particular magazine is actually quite good at -- witness them allowing their interns to write polite, personal rejection letters, something that rarely happens at most lit mags, let alone of that size/notoriety).
and as a writer myself, of course, it's good to keep the faith. anyone who is a writer and has also ever slogged through an editorial slush pile knows: it can be inspiring, and depressing, and confidence-boosting, and illusion-shattering. and there are
lots of papercuts. so, you know -- it's good to have good karma in that complex arena.
keepin' the faith man -- people are people after all.